詞語：who
who是什麼意思
簡明英漢詞典
who
[hu:]
pron.
誰, 那...的(人)
基本詞義
WHO
abbr.
世界衛生組織
美國傳統詞典[雙解]
who
who
AHD:[h?]
D.J.[hu8]
K.K.[hu]
pron.（代詞）
(1)What or which person or persons:
誰：什麼人、哪個人或哪些人：
Who left?
誰離開了?
(2)Used as a relative pronoun to introduce a clause when the antecedent is a person or persons or one to whom personality is attributed:
誰：當先行詞是一個或多個人或是被賦與身份的一個人時，用作關係代詞來引導從句：
the visitor who came yesterday; our child, who is gifted; informed sources who denied the story.
昨天來拜訪的那個人；我們天賦異稟的孩子；告訴那些不相信的人這個故事的來源
(3)The person or persons that; whoever:
誰：人或人們；不管什麼人：
Who believes that will believe anything.
相信那個的人會相信任何事
語源
(1)Middle English
中古英語
(2)from Old English hw3} * see k wo-
源自 古英語 hw3} *參見 k wo-
用法
The traditional rules that determine the use of who and whom are relatively simple: who is used for a grammatical subject, where a nominative pronoun such as I or he would be appropriate, and whom is used elsewhere. Thus, we write The actor who played Hamlet was there, since who stands for the subject of played Hamlet; and Who do you think is the best candidate? where who stands for the subject of is the best candidate. But we write To whom did you give the letter? since whom is the object of the preposition to; and The man whom the papers criticized did not show up, since whom is the object of the verb criticized. ? Considerable effort and attention are required to apply the rules correctly in complicated sentences. To produce correctly a sentence such as I met the man whom the government had tried to get France to extradite, we must anticipate when we write whom that it will function as the object of the verb extradite, several clauses distant from it. It is thus not surprising that writers from Shakespeare onward should often have interchanged who and whom. And though the distinction shows no signs of disappearing in formal style, strict adherence to the rules in informal discourse might be taken as evidence that the speaker or writer is paying undue attention to the form of what is said, possibly at the expense of its substance. In speech and informal writing who tends to predominate over whom; a sentence such as Who did John say he was going to support? will be regarded as quite natural, if strictly incorrect. By contrast, the use of whom where who would be required, as in Whom shall I say is calling? may be thought to betray a certain linguistic insecurity. ? When the relative pronoun stands for the object of a preposition that ends a sentence, whom is technically the correct form: the strict grammarian will insist on Whom (not who ) did you give it to? But grammarians since Noah Webster have argued that the excessive formality of whom in these cases is at odds with the relative informality associated with the practice of placing the preposition in final position and that the use of who in these cases should be regarded as entirely acceptable. ? The relative pronoun who may be used in restrictive relative clauses, in which case it is not preceded by a comma, or in nonrestrictive clauses, in which case a comma is required. Thus, we may say either The scientist who discovers a cure for cancer will be immortalized, where the clause who discovers a cure for cancer indicates which scientist will be immortalized, or The mathematician over there, who solved the four-color theorem, is widely known, where the clause who solved the four-color theorem adds information about a person already identified by the phrase the mathematician over there. ? Some grammarians have argued that only who and not that should be used to introduce a restrictive relative clause that identifies a person. This restriction has no basis either in logic or in the usage of the best writers; it is entirely acceptable to write either the man that wanted to talk to you or the man who wanted to talk to you. ? The grammatical rules governing the use of who and whom apply equally to whoever and whomever. See Usage Note at else, that, whose
確定用法的傳統規則who 和 whom 相對簡單： who 語法上用作主語，同 I 或 he 等主格代詞的位置相同， 而whom 用於別處。 這樣，我們寫The actor who played Hamlet was there （演哈姆雷特的演員在那邊）， 因此who 代表的是 played Hamlet 的主語。 在句子Who do you think is the best candidate? （你認為誰是最好的候選人?）中 who 代表 is the best candidate 的主語。 但是我們說To whom did you give the letter? （你把信給誰了?）， 因為whom 是介詞 to 的賓語； 在句子The man whom the papers criticized did not show up, （報紙上批評的那個人沒有來）， 因為whom 是動詞 criticized 的賓語 。在複雜的句子裡，正確應用這些規則需要相當的努力和注意。正確地造出如I met the man whom the government had tried to get France to extradite （我遇到了政府曾努力讓法國引渡的那個人）這樣的句子， 在寫whom 之前我們必須預知它將作動詞 extradite 的賓語， 儘管兩個詞離得很遠。這也就難怪自莎士比亞以來的作家經常把who 和 whom 交換使用了。 儘管在正式文體中兩者區別仍然存在，但如果在非正式的交談中嚴格地遵守這些規則會被認為說話者或作者可能不顧內容而過分注視說話的形式。在口語和非正式書面語中，who 趨向於代替 whom; 人們會認為象Who did John say he was going to support? （約翰說他將支持誰?）這樣句子很自然，儘管嚴格來說它是不正確的。 相反，在應該用who 的地方用 whom 則顯出一種語言上的不穩定， 如Whom shall I say is calling? （我說是誰在打電話?）。 當關係代詞替代句尾的介詞賓語時，whom 在理論上是正確的形勢： 嚴格的語法堅持Whom （而不是 who ) did you give it to?（你把它給誰了？） 但從諾·韋伯斯特以來的語法學家認為whom 在這種情況下過分正式，而把介詞放在句尾相對來說又不正式，這就有了矛盾，所以在這種情況下用 who 完全可以接受。 關係代詞who 可以用在限定關係從句中，前面不要加逗號， 也可用在非限定關係從句中，則需要加逗號。所以我們既可以說The scientist who discovers a cure for cancer will be immortalized （發現治癒癌症的方法的科學家將會因此而不朽）， 在此處從句who discovers a cure for cancer 指這樣的科學家將會不朽， 也可以說The mathematician over there, who solved the four-color theorem, is widely known （在那邊的數學家非常出名，他解決了四色定理）， 從句who solved the four-color theorem 給已經由短語 the mathematician over there 確定了的人增加了一些有關他的信息。 有些語法學家認為只有who 而不是 that 可以連接表示人的限定性關係從句。 這種限制在邏輯上沒有根據，在最優秀作家的用法中也未有根據；無論說the man that wanted to talk to you （想要跟你說話的那個人）或 the man who wanted to talk to you 都是完全可以接受的。 有關who 和 whom 的語法規則同樣適用於 whoever 和 whomever 參見 else， that， whose
基本詞義
WHO
WHO
abbr.（略語）
World Health Organization.
世界衛生組織
現代英漢詞典
WHO
[dQblju: eItF 5EJ]
abbr.
世界衛生組織 (the World Health Organization)
Who knows but (that) it may be so?
誰能說不會這樣呢。
Who was he? He was Dr. Martin Luther King.
他是誰?他就是馬丁.路德.金。
Who else's raincoat can this be?
這還可能是其他什麼人的雨衣呢?
who
[hu:]
pron.
(1)誰
Who is that man?
那人是誰？
Who gave you that book?
誰給你的那本書？
(2)…的人
a man who wants to see you
那個要見你的人
The man who lives in that house is my uncle.
住在那座房子裡的人是我叔叔。
(3)（在書面語中，說明逗號前的詞）他，她，他們
George, who lives in Scotland, came late.
喬治，他住在蘇格蘭，來晚了。
基本詞義
WHO
[dQblju: eItF 5EJ]
abbr.
世界衛生組織 (the World Health Organization)
Who knows but (that) it may be so?
誰能說不會這樣呢。
Who was he? He was Dr. Martin Luther King.
他是誰?他就是馬丁.路德.金。
Who else's raincoat can this be?
這還可能是其他什麼人的雨衣呢?
who
[hu:]
pron.
(1)誰
Who is that man?
那人是誰？
Who gave you that book?
誰給你的那本書？
(2)…的人
a man who wants to see you
那個要見你的人
The man who lives in that house is my uncle.
住在那座房子裡的人是我叔叔。
(3)（在書面語中，說明逗號前的詞）他，她，他們
George, who lives in Scotland, came late.
喬治，他住在蘇格蘭，來晚了。
現代英漢綜合大辭典
who
[hu:]
pron.
(賓格whom; 所有格whose)
(1)[疑問代詞]誰; 哪位
(2)[連接代詞]誰
(3)[限制性的關係代詞]...的人
(4)[非限制性的關係代詞]他[她]; 他[她]們
(5)[古][省略先行詞的關係代詞]...的人
W-is that?
那是誰?
He is a man who is of value to the people.
他是一個有益於人民的人。
Whom did you see?
你看見誰了?
That's the man who came to our house yesterday.
那就是昨天到過我們家來的人。
My cousin, who is a painter, is in Japan at present.
我的表哥是畫家, 他現在在日本。
Who breaks pays.
損壞者要賠。
詞性變化
who
n.
有關人物 the who and the why of it 與該事有關的人物及其發生的原因
習慣用語
who iswho(=who's who)
(1)知道某一範圍內所有的人是誰(It took the new teacher a few days to remember who was who in the class. 這位新教師花了幾天時間記住班上學生的名字)
(2)名[要]人, 有影響人士
Who's Who
名人錄, 名人詞典
基本詞義
WHO
(1)=White House Office 白宮辦公廳[美];
(2)World Health Organization 世界衛生組織
[七國語言]英漢公共大詞典
who
誰
[七國語言]英漢生物學大詞典
who
世界衛生與健康組織
[七國語言]英漢醫學大詞典
who
世界衛生組織
美國傳統詞典
who
who
AHD:[h?]
D.J.[hu8]
K.K.[hu]
pron.
(1)What or which person or persons:
Who left?
(2)Used as a relative pronoun to introduce a clause when the antecedent is a person or persons or one to whom personality is attributed:
the visitor who came yesterday; our child, who is gifted; informed sources who denied the story.
(3)The person or persons that; whoever:
Who believes that will believe anything.
語源
(1)Middle English
(2)from Old English hw3} * see k wo-
用法
The traditional rules that determine the use of who and whom are relatively simple: who is used for a grammatical subject, where a nominative pronoun such as I or he would be appropriate, and whom is used elsewhere. Thus, we write The actor who played Hamlet was there, since who stands for the subject of played Hamlet; and Who do you think is the best candidate? where who stands for the subject of is the best candidate. But we write To whom did you give the letter? since whom is the object of the preposition to; and The man whom the papers criticized did not show up, since whom is the object of the verb criticized. ? Considerable effort and attention are required to apply the rules correctly in complicated sentences. To produce correctly a sentence such as I met the man whom the government had tried to get France to extradite, we must anticipate when we write whom that it will function as the object of the verb extradite, several clauses distant from it. It is thus not surprising that writers from Shakespeare onward should often have interchanged who and whom. And though the distinction shows no signs of disappearing in formal style, strict adherence to the rules in informal discourse might be taken as evidence that the speaker or writer is paying undue attention to the form of what is said, possibly at the expense of its substance. In speech and informal writing who tends to predominate over whom; a sentence such as Who did John say he was going to support? will be regarded as quite natural, if strictly incorrect. By contrast, the use of whom where who would be required, as in Whom shall I say is calling? may be thought to betray a certain linguistic insecurity. ? When the relative pronoun stands for the object of a preposition that ends a sentence, whom is technically the correct form: the strict grammarian will insist on Whom (not who ) did you give it to? But grammarians since Noah Webster have argued that the excessive formality of whom in these cases is at odds with the relative informality associated with the practice of placing the preposition in final position and that the use of who in these cases should be regarded as entirely acceptable. ? The relative pronoun who may be used in restrictive relative clauses, in which case it is not preceded by a comma, or in nonrestrictive clauses, in which case a comma is required. Thus, we may say either The scientist who discovers a cure for cancer will be immortalized, where the clause who discovers a cure for cancer indicates which scientist will be immortalized, or The mathematician over there, who solved the four-color theorem, is widely known, where the clause who solved the four-color theorem adds information about a person already identified by the phrase the mathematician over there. ? Some grammarians have argued that only who and not that should be used to introduce a restrictive relative clause that identifies a person. This restriction has no basis either in logic or in the usage of the best writers; it is entirely acceptable to write either the man that wanted to talk to you or the man who wanted to talk to you. ? The grammatical rules governing the use of who and whom apply equally to whoever and whomever. See Usage Note at else, that, whose
基本詞義
WHO
WHO
abbr.
World Health Organization.
朗文英漢綜合電腦詞典
WHO
= World Health Organization,世界衛生組織
英漢地質大詞典
who
n.世界衛生組織
英漢法學大詞典
WHO
衛生組織
英漢環境大詞典
who
n.世界衛生組織
英漢化學大詞典
who
誰
英漢計算機大詞典
who
誰
英漢農牧林大詞典
who
n.世界衛生組織
航空英語縮寫詞典
WHO
World Health Organization 世界衛生組織
基本詞義
WHO
World Health Organization 世界衛生組織
英漢水利大詞典
WHO
n.聯合國世界衛生組織
英漢醫學大詞典
who
n.世界衛生組織;n.世界保健機構